Open Space in Sub-District of Lebak Siliwangi, Bandung City, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59897/jsi.v4i2.162Keywords:
Informal_settlement, open_space, typology, sustainability, communityAbstract
Some big parts of the world's population live in the city. While an increasing number population in the cities affects the demands for housing and settlements. But the housing is developed formally and informally. For informal settlements, one of the challenges is to provide open space for the community to do social activities. The objectives of the article are (1) to identify the typology of open spaces for the planning and design of a sustainable urban environment, city, and community, and (2) to recommend open space management in achieving the goal of SDGs 11.7 (provide universal access to safe, inclusive and accessible, green and public spaces, particularly for women and children, older persons and persons with disabilities). The method used is the literature review, interview, observation. The results showed that the Lebak Siliwangi Sub-District still needs to provide and manage the open space to accommodate community activities and social needs fulfilling. It is important to provide Common Open Spaces and Green Open Spaces to set up livelihood, lifestyles, and standards of community interaction for an urban community in informal settlements.
References
Darmawan, S., & Utami, T. B. (2018). Pola Pemanfaatan Ruang Terbuka Pada Pemukiman Kampung Kota. Vitruvian: Jurnal Arsitektur, Bangunan, Dan Lingkungan, 7(3), 127–136. https://www.neliti.com/publications/265313/
Herlambang, S. (2015). Pengantar Perencanaan Tapak. Perencanaan Tapak, 1–31.
Hutomo, A. S., & Fuad, A. H. (2020). Engagement and Well-Being in Public Space. Case Study: Suropati Park Jakarta. March. https://doi.org/10.5109/2740970
Jones, P. (2017). Formalizing the informal: Understanding the position of informal settlements and slums in sustainable urbanization policies and strategies in Bandung, Indonesia. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081436
Kudale, P., & Narkhede, P. G. (2022). Significance of common open spaces for Urban Poor Case of Pune, India. July.
Kushendar, D. H., Rusli, B., Muhtar, E. A., & Candradewini. (2021). Public Housing Management: Review of Rusunawa Policy in Cimahi City, Indonesia. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 1–11.
Maryati, S., Humaira, A. N. S., & Kipuw, D. M. (2018). From Informal to Formal: Status and Challenges of Informal Water Infrastructures in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 158(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/158/1/012005
Prawesti, S. A., Purnomo, D., & Hadiwijoyo, S. S. (2021). Analisis Pemanfaatan Ruang Terbuka Non Hijau Sebagai Representasi Ruang Sosial Di Kawasan Kumuh (Studi Wilayah Pancuran Kota Salatiga). Jurnal Analisa Sosiologi, 10, 41–59. https://doi.org/10.20961/jas.v10i0.47638
Profil Kelurahan Lebak Siliwangi 2017. (n.d.).
Rusnandar, N. (2010). Sejarah Kota Bandung Dari ”Bergdessa” (Desa Udik) Menjadi Bandung ”Heurin Ku Tangtung” (Metropolitan). Patanjala : Jurnal Penelitian Sejarah Dan Budaya, 2(2), 273. https://doi.org/10.30959/patanjala.v2i2.219
Sandalack, B. A., & Alaniz Uribe, F. G. (2010). Open Space Typology as a Framework for Design of the Public Realm. The Faces of Urbanized Space, 35–75. https://assets.centralparknyc.org/pdfs/institute/p2p-upelp/1.005_Open+Space+Typology+as+a+Framework+for+Design+of+the+Public+Realm.pdf
Suhartini, N., & Jones, P. (2019). Urban Governance and Informal Settlements: Lesson from the City of Jayapura, Indonesia.
Suhartini, N., & Jones, P. (2020). Better understanding self-organizing cities: A typology of order and rules in informal settlements. Journal of Regional and City Planning, 31(3), 237–263. https://doi.org/10.5614/jpwk.2020.31.3.2
The Major of Bandung City. (2015). Regulation of Bandung City Planning. 151, 10–17.
Wandl, A., Rooij, R., & Rocco, R. (2017). Towards Sustainable Territories-in-Between: A Multidimensional Typology of Open Spaces in Europe. Planning Practice and Research, 32(1), 55–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2016.1187978
